Gender Inequalities in Everyday Life

Main Article Content

Chhabra S*

Abstract

Background: Gender inequalities continue in all walks of life for all women, urban rural.


Objective: was to know gender differences in everyday life of women.


Material methods: Thousand non-pregnant and thousand, pregnant women were interviewed.


Results: The information revealed that around 90% pregnant, nonpregnant women, 25% men went to bed late, got up early. Women did all household chores, without any help from husbands. Grocery was brought by 269 nonpregnant, 78 pregnant women. Firewood was collected by 58% woman of 575, households where firewood was used 45% of 513 pregnant women's families. Of women who worked outside 61% of 656 nonpregnant, 93% of 353 pregnant did all household work also Age, education, occupation did not make any difference in gender inequality of everyday life.


Conclusion: All household chores are performed only by women even during pregnancy also, with some difference during pregnant state from nonpregnant. Less pregnant women worked outside, but those who worked did all household work also. Perception that men do outside jobs, women only household, was not true.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

S, C. (2015). Gender Inequalities in Everyday Life. Global Journal of Medical and Clinical Case Reports, 2(1), 003–007. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5282.000016
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2015 Chhabra S.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Global Gender Gap Report 2009 World economic forum

Gopalan R, Nanda V, Seru A (2007) A liated rms and nancial support: Evidence from Indian business groups. Jounal of Financial Economics 86: 759-795.

Sarkar NN (2008) Impact of intimate partner violence on women's reproductive health and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 28: 266-271.

Raj A, Sabarwal S, Decker MR, Nair S, Jetheva M, et al. (2007) Abuse from In –Laws during Pregnancy and Post –Partum : Qualitative and Quantitative Findings from Low –income Mother of Infants in Mumbai. India Maternal and Child Health Journal 15: 700-712.

David R Hekman, Karl Aquino, Bradley P Owens, Terence R Mitchell, Pauline Schilpzand, et al. (2010) An Examination of Whether and How Racial and Gender Biases Influence Customer Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal 53: 238-264.

Kuppuswami (2007) Socio-economic classification (INDIA) Last edited by Dhaval 12-21.

World economic Forum ,Global Gender Gap Report 2013-14

Gopalan S, Shiv M (2000) editors National profile on women, health and development India New Delhi Voluntary Health Association of India 1999 Women of South Asia: Health Profiles,1999,199-217, WHO 2000.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Health Systems: Improving Performance; 2000

Robinson J (2013) As We (still) Like It: Socializing, Religion, Kids Remain Our Favorite Daily Activities. Working Paper No. PWP-MPRC-2013-024. Maryland Population Research Center.

Sunder R (2000) Household survey of health care utilization and expenditure. Working paper No. 53 New Delhi National COUNCIL for Applied Economics Research 1995. Women of South East Asia: A Health Profile 7: 186.

Ali J, Yeo A, Gana TJ, Mclellan BA (1997) Predictors of fetal mortality in pregnant trauma patients. J Trauma 42: 782–785.

Vivian-Taylor J, Roberts CL, Chen JS, Ford JB (2012) Motor vehicle accidents during pregnancy: a population-based study. BJOG 119: 499–503.

Jones N, Holmes R (2010) Gender, politics and social protection. London: Overseas Development Institute

Friedman E, Marshall J (2004) Issues of Gender. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Hoof V, Jenny H (2011) “Rationalising inequality: heterosexual couples' explanations and justifications for the division of housework along traditionally gendered lines”. Journal of Gender Studies 20: 19-30.