The Cardiovascular Effects of Treatment with Atropine 0.01% Eyedrops to prevent the Progression of Childhood Myopia Cardiovascular effects of treatment with atropine 0.01% in children

Main Article Content

Luis Cavero-Roig
Lluís Cavero-Negre
Anna Monés
Àngels Ferrero
Paula S. Ventura
Jose M. Siurana*

Abstract

Abstract


The effectiveness of atropine eyedrops in preventing myopia progression in children has been confirmed, but cardiovascular effects have never been analysed. The objective of this study was to assess cardiovascular changes after treatment with atropine 0.01% eyedrops in 60 paediatric patients who were treated with atropine eyedrops due to myopic progression. Patients were analysed before treatment and 3 months after starting 1 drop daily. The parameters assessed were cardiovascular constants and electrocardiographic data.


The average age was 10.2 years, with a higher women percentage. The average follow-up period was 3.5 months. No patients presented pathological electrocardiographic findings and one patient reported symptoms: palpitations. A statistically significant decrease in heart rate (79 vs. 75 bpm) was reported, but without clinical significance. No changes in blood pressure were observed.


In conclusion, chronic therapy with low doses of atropine as a treatment for myopia progression does not result in pathological heart changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Luis Cavero-Roig, Cavero-Negre, L., Monés-Llivina, A., Ferrero-Rosanas, Àngels, Ventura, P. S., & Siurana*, J. M. (2024). The Cardiovascular Effects of Treatment with Atropine 0.01% Eyedrops to prevent the Progression of Childhood Myopia: Cardiovascular effects of treatment with atropine 0.01% in children. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiology, 11(2), 024–026. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-2976.000206
Short Communications

Copyright (c) 2024 Cavero-Roig L, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, et al. Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(4):697-708. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.010

Moriche-Carretero M, Revilla-Amores R, Gutiérrez-Blanco A, Moreno-Morillo FJ, Martinez-Perez C, Sánchez-Tena MÁ, et al. Five-year results of atropine 0.01% efficacy in the myopia control in a European population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024;108(5):715-719. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-322808

Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2). Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):347-354. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031

Gong Q, Janowski M, Luo M, Wei H, Chen B, Yang G, et al. Efficacy and adverse effects of atropine in childhood myopia: a meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(6):624-630. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1091

Vidhya C, Murali K, Sowmya R. Safety and efficacy of reconstituted atropine 0.01% eye drops for Indian children with myopic progression. Asian J Ophthalmol. 2020;17(2):209-215. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35119/asjoo.v17i2.572

Gong Q, Liu L. Therapeutic effect of atropine 1% in children with low myopia. JAAPOS. 2016;20(4):379. Available from: https://www.jaapos.org/article/S1091-8531(16)00085-9/fulltext

Pérez-Flores I, Macías-Murelaga B, Multicenter Group of Atropine Treatment for Myopia Control (GTAM), Barrio-Barrio J. Age-related results over 2 years of the multicenter Spanish study of atropine 0.01% in childhood myopia progression. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):16310. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43569-x

Kaila T, Korte JM, Saari KM. Systemic bioavailability of ocularly applied 1% atropine eyedrops. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77(2):193-196. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770215.x

Jones P, Peters MJ, Pinto da Costa N, Kurth T, Alberti C, Kessous K, et al. Atropine for critical care intubation in a cohort of 264 children and reduced mortality unrelated to effects on bradycardia. PLoS One. 2013;8(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057478

Eisa L, Passi Y, Lerman J, Raczka M, Heard C. Do small doses of atropine (<0.1 mg) cause bradycardia in young children? Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(7):684-688. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307868

Fleming S, Thompson M, Stevens R, Heneghan C, Plüddemann A, Maconochie I, et al. Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1011-1018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62226-x

O'Leary F, Hayen A, Lockie F, Peat J. Defining normal ranges and centiles for heart and respiratory rates in infants and children: a cross-sectional study of patients attending an Australian tertiary hospital paediatric emergency department. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(8):733-737. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307401