The role of cardiac rehabilitation in aviation medicine

Main Article Content

Jeffrey Dwyer*

Abstract

After a cardiovascular illness, an aviation license becomes invalid until the pilot obtains a special issuance medical certificate from the US Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) affirming successful medical treatment and rehabilitation. Many pilots attempt to regain health and fitness without the benefit of guidance from cardiac rehabilitation practitioners and, therefore, fail to satisfy FAA requirements. I the US, in 2016, more than 10,000 pilots with cardiovascular disorders were denied special issuance of a medical certificate. For many of these pilots with heart disease, participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program may have proven essential for successful completion of a rigorous medical examination that satisfied FAA requirements. This article highlights specific assistance provided by a cardiac rehabilitation program developed for pilots. Program objectives are; 1). the highest possible outcome, 2). establish a safe and effective independent exercise program, 3). obtain measures of compliance and success with an independent exercise program, 4). document tolerance of medications and ensure that the medication regimen complies with FAA guidelines, 5). document stability of the serum glucose in diabetic patients engaged in rigorous, prolonged exercise, and 6). prepare the patient for performance of a diagnostic treadmill test in which 100% HRmax must be achieved. It is estimated that fewer than 15% of pilots with heart disease utilize services offered by cardiac rehabilitation practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dwyer, J. (2020). The role of cardiac rehabilitation in aviation medicine. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiology, 7(2), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-2976.000136
Review Article(s)

Copyright (c) 2020 Dwyer J.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Federal Aviation Regulations. US Government Printing Office 2020.

Engelberg AL, HL Gibbons, TC Dodge (1986) A review of the medical standards for civilian airmen. JAMA 25: 1589-1599. Link: https://bit.ly/2YOv9MH

Office of Aviation Medicine. Guide for Medical Examiners (2020) US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Link: https://bit.ly/2AofwCa

McGiffin D, DC Naftel, Spann JL, Kirklin JK, Young JB, et al. (1998) Risk of death or incapacitation after heart transplantation, with particular reference to pilots. J Heart Lung Transpl 17: 497-504. Link: https://bit.ly/31BAclc

American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs. 6th. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2021. Link: https://bit.ly/2NIEgb5

Dwyer J (2001) Return to Flight Status After Cardiac rehabilitation: Three Case Histories. J Cardiopulmon Rehabil 21: 280-287. Link: https://bit.ly/3dO9HeV

Osswald S, Mikles R, Nixon W, Celio P (1996) Review of cardiac events in USAF aviators. Aviat Space Environ Med 67: 1023-1027. Link: https://bit.ly/2BRR5xo

Khan MA, Amroliwalla FK (1996) Flying status and coronary revascularization procedures in military aviators. Aviat Space Environ Med 67: 165-170. Link: https://bit.ly/3dPtpH1

Shiu MF (1988) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and flying status. Europ Heart J 101-105. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZmnxQq

Hoiberg A (1985) Cardiovascular disease among US Navy pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med 56: 397-402. Link: https://bit.ly/2YMgUI8

Chaitman BR, Davis KB, Dodge HT, Fisher LD, Pettinger M, et al. (1986) Should airplane pilots be eligible to resume active flight status after coronary bypass surgery?: A CASS registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 8: 1318-1324. Link: https://bit.ly/38hIS1k

Hammond IW, Lee ET, Davis AW, Booze CF (1984) Prognostic factors related to survival and complication-free times in airmen medically certified after coronary surgery. Aviat Space Environ Med 55: 321-331. Link: https://bit.ly/31FF60q

Toff WD, Camm AJ (1988) Implanted devices and aviation. Europ Heart J 9: 133-­138. Link: https://bit.ly/3gk3IzV

Toff WD, Edhag OK, Camm AJ (1992) Cardiac pacing and aviation. Europ Heart 13: 162-175. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZpNMph

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1995) Clinical Practice Guideline 17: Cardiac Rehabilitation. US Department of Health and Human Services publication 96-0672.

Thomas RJ (2007) Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention. A Raft for the rapids; Why have we missed the boat? Circ 116: 1644-1646. Link: https://bit.ly/2Zq0yEa