Quantitative nuclear cardiology and assessment of areas under risk via adenosine stress protocol-A pictorial assay for cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons during era of COVID
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2022 Karabacak Nİ, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):412-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.854893. PMID: 19808630.
Xu Y, Kavanagh P, Fish M, Gerlach J, Ramesh A, Lemley M, Hayes S, Berman DS, Germano G, Slomka PJ. Automated quality control for segmentation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2009 Sep;50(9):1418-26. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.061333. Epub 2009 Aug 18. PMID: 19690019; PMCID: PMC2935909.
Arsanjani R, Xu Y, Dey D, Vahistha V, Shalev A, Nakanishi R, Hayes S, Fish M, Berman D, Germano G, Slomka PJ. Improved accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease by machine learning in a large population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):553-62. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9706-2. Epub 2013 May 24. PMID: 23703378; PMCID: PMC3732038.
Arsanjani R, Dey D, Khachatryan T, Shalev A, Hayes SW, Fish M, Nakanishi R, Germano G, Berman DS, Slomka P. Prediction of revascularization after myocardial perfusion SPECT by machine learning in a large population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):877-84. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0027-x. Epub 2014 Dec 6. PMID: 25480110; PMCID: PMC4859156.
Slomka P, Xu Y, Berman D, Germano G. Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: strengths and pitfalls. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):338-46. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9509-2. PMID: 22302181; PMCID: PMC3412547.
Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):455-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.006. PMID: 17679053.
Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana C. The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):420-32. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.009. PMID: 17679051.
Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Slomka PJ, Van Kriekinge SD, Pollard G, Berman DS. Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):433-54. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.008. PMID: 17679052.
Liu YH. Quantification of nuclear cardiac images: the Yale approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.005. PMID: 17679055.
Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Vansant JP, Nichols KJ, DePuey EG, Pettigrew RI, Garcia EV. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images: an integrated method. J Nucl Med. 1999 Apr;40(4):650-9. PMID: 10210225.
Kumita S, Cho K, Nakajo H, Toba M, Uwamori M, Mizumura S, Kumazaki T, Sano J, Sakai S, Munakata K. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with electrocardiography-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: comparison with multigated equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):568-74. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.116853. PMID: 11593221.
Bax JJ, Lamb H, Dibbets P, Pelikan H, Boersma E, Viergever EP, Germano G, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Pauwels EK, Van der Wall EE. Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Dec 15;86(12):1299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01231-5. PMID: 11113402.
Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Moriel M, Mazzanti M, Su HT, Van Train KF, Berman DS. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1995 Nov;36(11):2138-47. PMID: 7472611.
Chua T, Yin LC, Thiang TH, Choo TB, Ping DZ, Leng LY. Accuracy of the automated assessment of left ventricular function with gated perfusion SPECT in the presence of perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):301-11. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2000.105279. PMID: 10958271.
Faber TL, Vansant JP, Pettigrew RI, Galt JR, Blais M, Chatzimavroudis G, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Waldrop SM, Gurtler-Krawczynska E, Wittry MD, Garcia EV. Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two methods. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;8(6):645-51. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.117173. PMID: 11725260.
Nakajima K, Nishimura T. Inter-institution preference-based variability of ejection fraction and volumes using quantitative gated SPECT with 99mTc-tetrofosmin: a multicentre study involving 106 hospitals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Feb;33(2):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1916-7. Epub 2005 Sep 29. PMID: 16193310.
Hyun IY, Kwan J, Park KS, Lee WH. Reproducibility of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi gated myocardial perfusion SPECT measurement of myocardial function. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Mar-Apr;8(2):182-7. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.112753. PMID: 11295696.
Nichols K, Santana CA, Folks R, Krawczynska E, Cooke CD, Faber TL, Bergmann SR, Garcia EV. Comparison between ECTb and QGS for assessment of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002 May-Jun;9(3):285-93. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2002.121449. PMID: 12032476.
Nakajima K, Higuchi T, Taki J, Kawano M, Tonami N. Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs. J Nucl Med. 2001 Oct;42(10):1571-8. PMID: 11585875.
Verberne HJ, Acampa W, Anagnostopoulos C, Ballinger J, Bengel F, De Bondt P, Buechel RR, Cuocolo A, van Eck-Smit BL, Flotats A, Hacker M, Hindorf C, Kaufmann PA, Lindner O, Ljungberg M, Lonsdale M, Manrique A, Minarik D, Scholte AJ, Slart RH, Trägårdh E, de Wit TC, Hesse B; European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(12):1929-40. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x. Epub 2015 Aug 21. PMID: 26290421; PMCID: PMC4589547.
Navare SM, Mather JF, Shaw LJ, Fowler MS, Heller GV. Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):551-61. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.06.128. PMID: 15472640.
Hochgruber T, Reichlin T, Wasila M, Vogler E, Twerenbold R, Sou SM, Roost K, Lee G, Fischer A, Freidank H, Osswald S, Zellweger MJ, Mueller C. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of different forms of stress testing. Clin Biochem. 2014 Apr;47(6):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Feb 25. PMID: 24582696.
Abu Daya H, Hage FG. Guidelines in review: ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Oct;24(5):1793-1799. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1017-6. Epub 2017 Aug 23. PMID: 28836156.
Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, Budoff MJ, Flamm SD, Hundley WG, Marwick TH, Mosca L, Patel AR, Quinones MA, Redberg RF, Taubert KA, Taylor AJ, Thomas GS, Wenger NK; Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):682-96. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155233.67287.60. Epub 2005 Feb 1. PMID: 15687114.
Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, Hachamovitch R, Arrighi JA, Merz CN, Gibbons RJ, Wenger NK, Heller GV; WOMEN Trial Investigators. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial. Circulation. 2011 Sep 13;124(11):1239-49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.029660. Epub 2011 Aug 15. PMID: 21844080.
Gorenoi V, Schönermark MP, Hagen A. CT coronary angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography in CHD. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2012;8:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/hta000100. Epub 2012 Apr 16. PMID: 22536300; PMCID: PMC3334923.
Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, Leipsic J, Raju R, Naoum C, Knuuti J, Mäki M, Underwood RS, Min JK, Elmore K, Stuijfzand WJ, van Royen N, Tulevski II, Somsen AG, Huisman MC, van Lingen AA, Heymans MW, van de Ven PM, van Kuijk C, Lammertsma AA, van Rossum AC, Knaapen P. Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1100-1107. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2471. PMID: 28813561; PMCID: PMC5710451.
Fenouillet E, Mottola G, Kipson N, Paganelli F, Guieu R, Ruf J. Adenosine Receptor Profiling Reveals an Association between the Presence of Spare Receptors and Cardiovascular Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 27;20(23):5964. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235964. PMID: 31783510; PMCID: PMC6928742.
Bahreyni A, Avan A, Shabani M, Ryzhikov M, Fiuji H, Soleimanpour S, Khazaei M, Hassanian SM. Therapeutic potential of A2 adenosine receptor pharmacological regulators in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, recent progress, and prospective. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Feb;234(2):1295-1299. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27161. Epub 2018 Aug 26. PMID: 30146778.
Peleli M, Fredholm BB, Sobrevia L, Carlström M. Pharmacological targeting of adenosine receptor signaling. Mol Aspects Med. 2017 Jun;55:4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12. PMID: 28088486.